Chad Kissell vs Jesse Witten Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W L L
Form
W L W W L L W W L WH2H: Kissell 1 - 0 Witten
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kissell winning 2 and Witten winning 1. The last match between Kissell and Witten was at the M15 Cancun, 30-01-2020, Second, Hard with Chad Kissell getting the victory 3-6 6-2 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chad Kissell | 1 |
| Jesse Witten | 0 |
M15 Cancun(30-01-2020)
3
6
6
2
7
6
| Kissell | Stats | Witten |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | 163 | |
| 29 | Age | 42 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 11 |
| 54% (68-59) | Career Total W/L | 56% (305-244) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $148,620 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Chad Kissell
Player
Jesse Witten
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
10
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
11
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
52 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 2:36:0 | Average Match Time | 2:36:0 |
| 57% (64/112) | 1st Serve % | 63% (57/90) |
| 64% (41/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (40/57) |
| 40% (19/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (8/33) |
| 64% (7/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (6/17) |
| 47% (42/90) | Return Points Win % | 46% (52/112) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chad Kissell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Chad Kissell
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
14
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Dominko
Player
Chad Kissell
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Chad Kissell
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesse Witten Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Witten
Player
Patrick Kypson
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
10
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Jesse Witten
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-2 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Jesse Witten
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Jesse Witten
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Chad Kissell
Player
Jesse Witten
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
10
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
11
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
52 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Witten
Player
Jose Pereira
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (68/59) | Win/Loss | 56% (305/244) |
| 54% (154/133) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (690/579) |
| 52% (1445/1347) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6257/5906) |
| 57% (51/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (188/136) |
| 41% (7/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (85/72) |
| 50% (10/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (25/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 314 | Aces Total | 784 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 205 | Total Double Faults | 591 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 255.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 586.32 |
| 57% (2512/4428) | 1st Serve % | 56% (6095/10910) |
| 69% (1744/2512) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (4278/6095) |
| 45% (860/1916) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2291/4815) |
| 42% (149/357) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (475/1087) |
| 38% (1586/4222) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4397/11087) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 51% (21/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 27% (3/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (17/26) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 51% (147/143) |
| 54% (68/59) | Futures W/L | 71% (117/47) |
| 53% (67/126) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (295/530) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 33% (11/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (104/182) |
| 44% (15/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (83/161) |
| 84% (73/61) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (313/260) |
| 16% (73/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (313/53) |
| 13% (54/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (236/44) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
